Back to 3Qs
Signs that a strategic course correction is required can come from internal or external sources.
Abhishek Malhotra
on
Strategy
Abhishek Malhotra is President – Strategy at RPSG Group, leading enterprise-wide strategy and transformation. He was previously a Partner at McKinsey, heading the Consumer Sector and Marketing & Sales Practice in India. With 28+ years of global consulting and leadership experience, he is a trusted advisor to top executives. Based in Kolkata, he enjoys improving his tennis game and learning pickleball.
Q1
When a company engages in blue-sky thinking, what are the things it should keep in mind, and what should it avoid?

Blue-sky thinking encourages companies to explore strategies in an unconstrained manner and be open to limitless possibilities. In such situations, the objective is not to come up with the best or most effective idea but to brainstorm multiple ideas, no matter how eccentric or asymmetric they may appear at first.

Given this approach, companies should ensure they involve a broader set of cross-functional stakeholders who bring in varied perspectives. In some cases, changes in the venue (e.g. an offsite location or a customer or supplier site) help.

To make this successful, leaders should ensure that all voices are heard and ideas are not shot down. Lastly, any past biases (e.g. "we have tried this earlier") should be left outside the room.

Q2
What are the early signs that a business leader should look for to know when a strategic course correction is needed?

Signs that a strategic course correction is required can come from internal or external sources.

Typical external sources can cover multiple stakeholders such as customers (cancelled orders or an increase in complaints), investors (selling shares in the company), competitors (growing at a relatively faster pace in terms of revenue or bottom line), or even suppliers (refusal to do business).

In addition, internal sources can also help identify leading signals – these can come from employees in terms of higher attrition or lower employee satisfaction scores. Open conflict within leadership teams – specifically cross-functional – often highlights impending risk.

A leader is always in listening mode across all these stakeholders, trying to decipher what is noise and what is the underlying message being conveyed.

Q3
On a personal note, could you tell us about the mentors or leaders who have significantly shaped your strategic thinking and leadership style? What key lessons did you learn from them?

I have had the fortune of having many mentors who have guided me in my career, helped shape me, and left a stamp on my leadership style as well as my ability to drive strategic thinking. These mentors have included seniors, peers, and even juniors – you never know where the learning can come from.

The key to this is to realise that the inputs you need to be successful keep changing as you progress in your career. And secondly, you have to be open to listen, absorb, and adapt your own style based on the situation at hand.

One of the most critical lessons for me was how having a people-centric leadership style can stand you in good stead for years – helping you to build supporters who will ensure your long-term success. And this comes from investing time and showing genuine interest in the well-being of others around you. Over the years, many folks have done this for me, and I hope I can pay forward even a small portion of what I received.